On 3/12/21 6:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 03:07:38PM -0700, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
The gimple_call_alloc_size() function is documented to "return null
when STMT is not a call to a valid allocation function" but the code
assumes STMT is a call statement, causin
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 09:04:33AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > from the start of the function and add is_gimple_call (stmt) &&
> > in tree-ssa-strlen.c.
>
> Maybe even make it convert it to taking a "const gcall *", so those
>
> if (is_gimple_call (stmt))
> {
>...
>if (g
On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 14:52 +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 03:07:38PM -0700, Martin Sebor via Gcc-
> patches wrote:
> > The gimple_call_alloc_size() function is documented to "return null
> > when STMT is not a call to a valid allocation function" but the
> >
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 03:07:38PM -0700, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> The gimple_call_alloc_size() function is documented to "return null
> when STMT is not a call to a valid allocation function" but the code
> assumes STMT is a call statement, causing the function to ICE when
> it isn't.
The gimple_call_alloc_size() function is documented to "return null
when STMT is not a call to a valid allocation function" but the code
assumes STMT is a call statement, causing the function to ICE when
it isn't.
The attached patch changes the function to fulfill its contract and
return null als
