On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 02:02:14PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Thank you for the review!
> I have fixed the style and committed this.
>
> Would it be okay to backport this to gcc-13 and gcc-14?
> Bootstrap and regtest pass on x86_64-redhat-linux.
Ok.
Jakub
On Fri, 2025-01-24 at 17:25 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 01:15:30AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux. Ok for master?
> >
> >
> >
> > The FakeStack flag is not zeroed out when can_store_by_pieces()
> > returns false. O
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 01:15:30AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux. Ok for master?
>
>
>
> The FakeStack flag is not zeroed out when can_store_by_pieces()
> returns false. Over time, this causes FakeStack::Allocate() to perform
> the maximum n
On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 01:15 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux. Ok for master?
>
>
>
> The FakeStack flag is not zeroed out when can_store_by_pieces()
> returns false. Over time, this causes FakeStack::Allocate() to
> perform
> the maximum number
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux. Ok for master?
The FakeStack flag is not zeroed out when can_store_by_pieces()
returns false. Over time, this causes FakeStack::Allocate() to perform
the maximum number of loop iterations, significantly slowing down the
instrumented program.
