Re: [PATCH] arm: Fixed C23 call compatibility with arm-none-eabi

On 2024-03-01 15:58, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 19/02/2024 09:13, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote: Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-13? Regtested on top of 945cb8490cb for arm-none-eabi, without any regression. Backporting to releases/gcc-13 will change -std=c23 to -std=c2x. Jakub has just pu

Re: [PATCH] arm: Fixed C23 call compatibility with arm-none-eabi

On 19/02/2024 09:13, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote: > Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-13? > Regtested on top of 945cb8490cb for arm-none-eabi, without any regression. > > Backporting to releases/gcc-13 will change -std=c23 to -std=c2x. Jakub has just pushed a different fix for this, so I don't think we n

Re: [PATCH] arm: Fixed C23 call compatibility with arm-none-eabi

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 1:14 AM Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote: > > Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-13? > Regtested on top of 945cb8490cb for arm-none-eabi, without any regression. > > Backporting to releases/gcc-13 will change -std=c23 to -std=c2x. > > -- > > In commit 4fe34cdcc80ac225b80670eabc38ac5e31ce

[PATCH] arm: Fixed C23 call compatibility with arm-none-eabi

Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-13? Regtested on top of 945cb8490cb for arm-none-eabi, without any regression. Backporting to releases/gcc-13 will change -std=c23 to -std=c2x. -- In commit 4fe34cdcc80ac225b80670eabc38ac5e31ce8a5a, -std=c23 support was introduced to support functions without any na