> -Original Message-
> From: Andre Vieira (lists)
> Sent: 03 February 2021 13:58
> To: Kyrylo Tkachov ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: ja...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix up neon_vector_mem_operand [PR97528]
>
> Same patch applies cleanly on gcc-8,
-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; ja...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix up neon_vector_mem_operand [PR97528]
Hi,
This is a gcc-9 backport of the PR97528 fix that has been applied to
trunk and gcc-10.
Bootstraped on arm-linux-gnueabihf and regression tested.
OK for gcc-9 branch?
Ok
> -Original Message-
> From: Andre Vieira (lists)
> Sent: 02 February 2021 17:27
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; ja...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix up neon_vector_mem_operand [PR97528]
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a gcc-9 backpo
Sent: 19 November 2020 18:57
To: Richard Earnshaw ; Ramana
Radhakrishnan ; Kyrylo Tkachov
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: Fix up neon_vector_mem_operand [PR97528]
Hi!
The documentation for POST_MODIFY says:
Currently, the compiler can only handle second operands of the
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: 19 November 2020 18:57
> To: Richard Earnshaw ; Ramana
> Radhakrishnan ; Kyrylo Tkachov
>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: Fix up neon_vector_mem_operand [PR97528]
>
> Hi!
>
&g
Hi!
The documentation for POST_MODIFY says:
Currently, the compiler can only handle second operands of the
form (plus (reg) (reg)) and (plus (reg) (const_int)), where
the first operand of the PLUS has to be the same register as
the first operand of the *_MODIFY.
The following testcase
