Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix signedness of some vld1q intrinsic parameters for ARM NEON

2025-03-05 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 20/02/2025 14:09, Hannes Braun wrote: > vld1q_s8_x3, vld1q_s16_x3, vld1q_s8_x4 and vld1q_s16_x4 were expecting > pointers to unsigned integers. These parameters should be pointers to > signed integers. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/arm/arm_neon.h (vld1q_s8_x3): Use int8_t instead of >

Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix signedness of some vld1q intrinsic parameters for ARM NEON

2025-02-20 Thread Christophe Lyon
Hi, On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 15:18, Hannes Braun wrote: > > vld1q_s8_x3, vld1q_s16_x3, vld1q_s8_x4 and vld1q_s16_x4 were expecting > pointers to unsigned integers. These parameters should be pointers to > signed integers. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/arm/arm_neon.h (vld1q_s8_x3): Use in

[PATCH] arm: Fix signedness of some vld1q intrinsic parameters for ARM NEON

2025-02-20 Thread Hannes Braun
vld1q_s8_x3, vld1q_s16_x3, vld1q_s8_x4 and vld1q_s16_x4 were expecting pointers to unsigned integers. These parameters should be pointers to signed integers. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/arm/arm_neon.h (vld1q_s8_x3): Use int8_t instead of uint16_t. (vld1q_s16_x3): Use int16_t