On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 15:51, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Christophe Lyon writes:
> > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 20:33, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> These tests were inspired by the corresponding aarch64 ones that I just
> >> committed. They already pass.
> >>
> >> Tested on arm-linux-gn
Christophe Lyon writes:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 20:33, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> These tests were inspired by the corresponding aarch64 ones that I just
>> committed. They already pass.
>>
>> Tested on arm-linux-gnueabi, arm-linux-gnueabihf and armeb-eabi.
>> OK for trunk?
>>
>> Richard
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 20:33, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> These tests were inspired by the corresponding aarch64 ones that I just
> committed. They already pass.
>
> Tested on arm-linux-gnueabi, arm-linux-gnueabihf and armeb-eabi.
> OK for trunk?
>
> Richard
>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.
Kyrylo Tkachov writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Sandiford
>> Sent: 23 September 2020 19:34
>> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Cc: ni...@redhat.com; Richard Earnshaw ;
>> Ramana Radhakrishnan ; Kyrylo
>> Tkachov
Hi Richard,
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Sent: 23 September 2020 19:34
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: ni...@redhat.com; Richard Earnshaw ;
> Ramana Radhakrishnan ; Kyrylo
> Tkachov
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: Add a couple of extra stack-pr
These tests were inspired by the corresponding aarch64 ones that I just
committed. They already pass.
Tested on arm-linux-gnueabi, arm-linux-gnueabihf and armeb-eabi.
OK for trunk?
Richard
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-5.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/stack-pro
