Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Impose recursion limit on indirect calls.

2021-09-20 Thread Ankur Saini via Gcc-patches
[ Sorry for very late response ] > On 27-Aug-2021, at 6:28 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 8/27/21 14:44, Ankur Saini wrote: >> While working on patch to convert most of the 8 whitespace characters to >> tabs in the analyzer’s source, I see this weird behaviour where at some >> places indentati

Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Impose recursion limit on indirect calls.

2021-08-27 Thread Martin Liška
On 8/27/21 14:44, Ankur Saini wrote: While working on patch to convert most of the 8 whitespace characters to tabs in the analyzer’s source, I see this weird behaviour where at some places indentation looks weird when viewed in patch file ( generated via “git format-patch” ) but looks alright

Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Impose recursion limit on indirect calls.

2021-08-27 Thread Ankur Saini via Gcc-patches
While working on patch to convert most of the 8 whitespace characters to tabs in the analyzer’s source, I see this weird behaviour where at some places indentation looks weird when viewed in patch file ( generated via “git format-patch” ) but looks alright when viewed in text editor. Here is

Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Impose recursion limit on indirect calls.

2021-08-25 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 21:25 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: > > > > On 25-Aug-2021, at 8:35 PM, David Malcolm > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 20:31 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 25-Aug-2021, at 7:24 PM, Martin Liška > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 8/25/21 15:22, Davi

Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Impose recursion limit on indirect calls.

2021-08-25 Thread Ankur Saini via Gcc-patches
> On 25-Aug-2021, at 8:35 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 20:31 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: >> >> >>> On 25-Aug-2021, at 7:24 PM, Martin Liška wrote: >>> >>> On 8/25/21 15:22, David Malcolm via Gcc-patches wrote: On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 13:39 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Impose recursion limit on indirect calls.

2021-08-25 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 20:31 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: > > > > On 25-Aug-2021, at 7:24 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > > > > On 8/25/21 15:22, David Malcolm via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 13:39 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: > > > > This should also fix the failing regression found in P

Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Impose recursion limit on indirect calls.

2021-08-25 Thread Martin Liška
On 8/25/21 15:22, David Malcolm via Gcc-patches wrote: On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 13:39 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: This should also fix the failing regression found in PR analyzer/101980. - The patch is in sync with current master - successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. The pat

Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Impose recursion limit on indirect calls.

2021-08-25 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 13:39 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: > This should also fix the failing regression found in PR > analyzer/101980. > > - The patch is in sync with current master > - successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. > The patch is OK for trunk. Thanks for fixing this Dav

[PATCH] analyzer: Impose recursion limit on indirect calls.

2021-08-25 Thread Ankur Saini via Gcc-patches
This should also fix the failing regression found in PR analyzer/101980. - The patch is in sync with current master - successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. fix.patch Description: Binary data Thanks - Ankur