On 10/1/19 11:16 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Attached is an implementation of the __has_builtin special
> preprocessor operator/macro analogous to __has_attribute and
> (hopefully) compatible with the synonymous Clang feature (I
> couldn't actually find tests for it in the Clang test suite
> but if s
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00062.html
I was privately pointed at the Clang tests. The implementation
passes most of them. The one difference I noticed is that GCC
expands macros in the __has_builtin argument list while Clang
doesn't. Since this is in line with other si
Hi Martin,
Martin Sebor wrote:
> Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00062.html
>
> On 10/1/19 11:16 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Attached is an implementation of the __has_builtin special
>> preprocessor operator/macro analogous to __has_attribute and
>> (hopefully) compatible wi
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00062.html
On 10/1/19 11:16 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is an implementation of the __has_builtin special
preprocessor operator/macro analogous to __has_attribute and
(hopefully) compatible with the synonymous Clang feature (I
couldn't act
On 10/1/19 11:38 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 11:16:10AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is an implementation of the __has_builtin special
preprocessor operator/macro analogous to __has_attribute and
(hopefully) compatible with the synonymous Clang feature (I
couldn't act
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 11:16:10AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Attached is an implementation of the __has_builtin special
> preprocessor operator/macro analogous to __has_attribute and
> (hopefully) compatible with the synonymous Clang feature (I
> couldn't actually find tests for it in the Clang
Attached is an implementation of the __has_builtin special
preprocessor operator/macro analogous to __has_attribute and
(hopefully) compatible with the synonymous Clang feature (I
couldn't actually find tests for it in the Clang test suite
but if someone points me at them I'll verify it).
Tested