Hi,
Let me make some comments from the kernel side.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:58:25AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 28/04/16 09:47, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> >> On Apr 27, 2016, at 7:26 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> >>
> >> with -mfentry, by default the user only has to
> >> implement the fentry
On 04/28/2016 05:18 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:39:48AM +0300, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Apr 27, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
Your current patch is great for experiments for the kernel engineers to check
if suggested approaches to code patching will work. Stil
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:58:25AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 28/04/16 09:47, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> >> On Apr 27, 2016, at 7:26 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> >>
> >> with -mfentry, by default the user only has to
> >> implement the fentry call (linux wants nops there, but
> >> e.g. glibc coul
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:39:48AM +0300, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> > On Apr 27, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>
> Your current patch is great for experiments for the kernel engineers to check
> if suggested approaches to code patching will work. Still, I prefer to
> implement LTO-friend
On 28/04/16 09:47, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> On Apr 27, 2016, at 7:26 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>>
>> with -mfentry, by default the user only has to
>> implement the fentry call (linux wants nops there, but
>> e.g. glibc could use -pg -mfentry for profiling on
>> aarch64 and the target specific deta
> On Apr 27, 2016, at 7:26 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>
> On 27/04/16 16:22, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> thanks for starting the work on this; I have added the missing
>> command line option. It builds now and the resulting compiler generates
>> a linux kernel with the desired propertie
> On Apr 27, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
> thanks for starting the work on this; I have added the missing
> command line option. It builds now and the resulting compiler generates
> a linux kernel with the desired properties, so work can continue there.
Thanks for work
On 27/04/16 16:22, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> thanks for starting the work on this; I have added the missing
> command line option. It builds now and the resulting compiler generates
> a linux kernel with the desired properties, so work can continue there.
>
> Torsten
i guess the
Hi Maxim,
thanks for starting the work on this; I have added the missing
command line option. It builds now and the resulting compiler generates
a linux kernel with the desired properties, so work can continue there.
Torsten
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
