On 19 November 2013 15:29, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> Can someone please commit it for me?
>
> Thanks,
> Cesar
Done, with CangeLog
2013-11-19 Cesar Philippidis
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c (__aarch64__):
Remove defined(__linux__).
On 11/19/13, 1:37 AM, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 18 November 2013 18:02, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>
gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c test on aarch64. The reason why this
test fails is because aarch64 does not trap on integer division by zero.
Is this OK for trunk? If so, p
On 18 November 2013 18:02, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>> gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c test on aarch64. The reason why this
>>> test fails is because aarch64 does not trap on integer division by zero.
>>>
>>> Is this OK for trunk? If so, please commit it because I do not have an
>>> svn accou
On 11/18/13 11:02, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
On 11/18/13, 10:01 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
This patch addresses the failures caused by the
gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c test on aarch64. The reason why this
test fails is because aarch6
On 11/18/13, 10:01 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
>> This patch addresses the failures caused by the
>> gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c test on aarch64. The reason why this
>> test fails is because aarch64 does not trap on integer division
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> This patch addresses the failures caused by the
> gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c test on aarch64. The reason why this
> test fails is because aarch64 does not trap on integer division by zero.
>
> Is this OK for trunk? If so, please c
This patch addresses the failures caused by the
gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c test on aarch64. The reason why this
test fails is because aarch64 does not trap on integer division by zero.
Is this OK for trunk? If so, please commit it because I do not have an
svn account.
Thanks,
Cesar
