On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 02:31:34PM +, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> > Would you recommend to re-phrase the commit message?
>
> Thanks for explaining. Yes, I think describing the use case a bit more in the
> commit message like you just did would be useful.
> Ok with that change.
> Kyrill
Thanks
> On 29 Nov 2024, at 14:25, Yury Khrustalev wrote:
>
> Hi Kyrill,
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 02:06:17PM +, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>> Hi Yury,
>>
>>> On 29 Nov 2024, at 13:57, Yury Khrustalev wrote:
>>>
>>> Inclusion of "arm_acle.h" would requires stdint.h that may
>>> not be available d
Hi Kyrill,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 02:06:17PM +, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Yury,
>
> > On 29 Nov 2024, at 13:57, Yury Khrustalev wrote:
> >
> > Inclusion of "arm_acle.h" would requires stdint.h that may
> > not be available during first stage of cross-compilation.
>
> Do you mean when try
Hi Yury,
> On 29 Nov 2024, at 13:57, Yury Khrustalev wrote:
>
> Inclusion of "arm_acle.h" would requires stdint.h that may
> not be available during first stage of cross-compilation.
Do you mean when trying to build a big-endian cross-compiler or something?
The change seems harmless to me but t
Inclusion of "arm_acle.h" would requires stdint.h that may
not be available during first stage of cross-compilation.
libgcc/ChangeLog:
* config/aarch64/aarch64-unwind.h (_CHKFEAT_GCS): Add.
---
Regression tested on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu and no regressions have been
found.
Is this
