On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:00:24PM +0100, Andrew Carlotti wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 04:49:03PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Andrew Carlotti writes:
> > > We don't yet have a separate feature flag for FEAT_LRCPC2 (and adding
> > > one will require extending the feature bitmask). Inst
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 04:49:03PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Andrew Carlotti writes:
> > We don't yet have a separate feature flag for FEAT_LRCPC2 (and adding
> > one will require extending the feature bitmask). Instead, make the
> > FEAT_LRCPC patterns available when either armv8.4-a or
Andrew Carlotti writes:
> We don't yet have a separate feature flag for FEAT_LRCPC2 (and adding
> one will require extending the feature bitmask). Instead, make the
> FEAT_LRCPC patterns available when either armv8.4-a or +rcpc3 is
> specified. On the other hand, we already have a +rcpc flag, so
We don't yet have a separate feature flag for FEAT_LRCPC2 (and adding
one will require extending the feature bitmask). Instead, make the
FEAT_LRCPC patterns available when either armv8.4-a or +rcpc3 is
specified. On the other hand, we already have a +rcpc flag, so this
dependency can be specified
