On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 04:20 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > * If TYPE_SIZE_UNIT if the pointer target type is zero. This could be the
> > case for empty structures or zero-size arrays (both GNU extensions).
> > Logically there's nothing wrong with atomic operat
On 11/22/2011 04:20 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
* If TYPE_SIZE_UNIT if the pointer target type is zero. This could be the
case for empty structures or zero-size arrays (both GNU extensions).
Logically there's nothing wrong with atomic operations on such a zero-size
object (they should evaluate al
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> int n = get_atomic_generic_size (loc, function, params);
>
> + /* Size of 0 is an error condition. */
> + if (n == 0)
> + {
> + *new_return = error_mark_node;
> + return true;
> + }
As far as I can see, get_atomic_generi
PR 51256 points out that
void *p;
__atomic_compare_exchange(p, p, p, 0, 0, 0);
results in an ICE.
This patch reports the error that a generic function call must not have
a void pointer for the first argument, or a size of the object cannot be
determined. It also now returns error_mark_node w
