> On 08/04/2017 11:15 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>>OK for trunk if bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64 succeeds?
> >>Yea, but I'd like to see ongoing work towards full checking.
> >
> >I have full checking in my tree for some time. At x86-64 bootstrap there
> >is one remaining offender in simd_clone_a
On 08/04/2017 11:15 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
III.
I've written this patch to check for the missing probability more
consistently. I'm not certain if we can require that the probability
should always be set, so I'm just requiring that if it is set on one
outgoing edge, it needs to be set on all ou
On 08/04/2017 11:15 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
OK for trunk if bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64 succeeds?
Yea, but I'd like to see ongoing work towards full checking.
I have full checking in my tree for some time. At x86-64 bootstrap there
is one remaining offender in simd_clone_adjust which was
> >
> > III.
> >
> > I've written this patch to check for the missing probability more
> > consistently. I'm not certain if we can require that the probability
> > should always be set, so I'm just requiring that if it is set on one
> > outgoing edge, it needs to be set on all outgoing edges.
> >
On 08/02/2017 10:07 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I.
>
> for target nvptx we recently ran into PR81442, an ICE in verify_flow_info:
> ...
> error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB is set but cfg probability is not
> ...
>
> We start out with a jump instruction:
> ...
> (jump_insn 18 17 31 2 (se
Hi,
I.
for target nvptx we recently ran into PR81442, an ICE in verify_flow_info:
...
error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB is set but cfg probability is not
...
We start out with a jump instruction:
...
(jump_insn 18 17 31 2 (set (pc)
(if_then_else (ne (reg:BI 83)
(const
