On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:27:47PM +, Paulo Matos wrote:
>> Yes, it looks strange but it was the way we came up with to
>> implement an instruction that loads from a pair of addresses.
>>
>> From what I wrote previously to Richard.
>> "We
On 30/01/14 20:47, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:27:47PM +, Paulo Matos wrote:
Yes, it looks strange but it was the way we came up with to
implement an instruction that loads from a pair of addresses.
From what I wrote previously to Richard.
"We have an instruction that l
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:27:47PM +, Paulo Matos wrote:
> Yes, it looks strange but it was the way we came up with to
> implement an instruction that loads from a pair of addresses.
>
> From what I wrote previously to Richard.
> "We have an instruction that loads two 32 bit values into a lowe
On 30/01/14 17:10, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Right, in the context:
Just in case: the point I was trying to make in the second paragraph
was that the code in the patch only triggers (as you say) because the
address isn't seen as mode-dependent. But this kind of address does
look mod
On 30/01/14 14:01, Richard Biener wrote:
I'm curious on where you are seeing MEMs with a vector mode address.
What does that MEM even mean?
Yes, it looks strange but it was the way we came up with to implement an
instruction that loads from a pair of addresses.
From what I wrote previously
Paulo Matos writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: 30 January 2014 12:43
>> To: Paulo Matos
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Vector mode addresses
>>
>>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Paulo Matos wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: 30 January 2014 12:43
>> To: Paulo Matos
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Vector mode
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 30 January 2014 12:43
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Vector mode addresses
>
> Paulo Matos writes:
> > As a followup of the thr
Paulo Matos writes:
> As a followup of the thread:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-01/msg00206.html
>
> consider the attached patch for submission. It fixes an ICE in case
> you try to use vector mode addresses and do not have it as mode
> dependent target hook. As discussed in the thread adding
As a followup of the thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-01/msg00206.html
consider the attached patch for submission. It fixes an ICE in case you try to
use vector mode addresses and do not have it as mode dependent target hook.
As discussed in the thread adding VECTOR_MODE_P to the target hoo
10 matches
Mail list logo
