On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 1:28 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> @Richi: May I please ping this?
I have commented in the PR and am testing a patch - other PRs may prevail.
Richard.
> On 9/1/20 4:27 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 8/31/20 10:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:18 P
@Richi: May I please ping this?
On 9/1/20 4:27 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 8/31/20 10:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM Martin Liška wrote:
Hey.
The patch is about VEC_COND_EXP comparison of a SSA_NAME with a constant
that is artifact of -fno-tree-ccp.
Patch can b
On 8/31/20 10:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM Martin Liška wrote:
Hey.
The patch is about VEC_COND_EXP comparison of a SSA_NAME with a constant
that is artifact of -fno-tree-ccp.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hey.
>
> The patch is about VEC_COND_EXP comparison of a SSA_NAME with a constant
> that is artifact of -fno-tree-ccp.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?
Err, no - we shouldn
Hey.
The patch is about VEC_COND_EXP comparison of a SSA_NAME with a constant
that is artifact of -fno-tree-ccp.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/96466
* gimple-fold