Re: [PATCH] Use warning_n instead of warning_at in gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c

2018-02-28 Thread Joseph Myers
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > This patch should fix most of the translation issues with plural forms > in gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c, now that warning_n accepts UHWI, we can and > should just use warning_n in those cases. > > I haven't touched the first set of warning_at ca

[PATCH] Use warning_n instead of warning_at in gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c

2018-02-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! This patch should fix most of the translation issues with plural forms in gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c, now that warning_n accepts UHWI, we can and should just use warning_n in those cases. I haven't touched the first set of warning_at calls, because the current wording requires two plural form