On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> On 03 Nov 14:42, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Ilya Enkovich
>> wrote:
>> > 2015-10-28 18:21 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
>> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ilya Enkovich
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>
On 03 Nov 14:42, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> > 2015-10-28 18:21 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ilya Enkovich
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Testing boolean vector conversions I found several runtime regressi
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2015-10-28 18:21 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ilya Enkovich
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Testing boolean vector conversions I found several runtime regressions
>>> and investigation showed it's due to incorrec
2015-10-28 18:21 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Testing boolean vector conversions I found several runtime regressions
>> and investigation showed it's due to incorrect conversion caused by
>> unsigned boolean type. When boolean vec
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Testing boolean vector conversions I found several runtime regressions
> and investigation showed it's due to incorrect conversion caused by
> unsigned boolean type. When boolean vector is represented as an
> integer vector on target
Hi,
Testing boolean vector conversions I found several runtime regressions
and investigation showed it's due to incorrect conversion caused by
unsigned boolean type. When boolean vector is represented as an
integer vector on target it's a signed integer actually. Unsigned
boolean type was chosen
