Re: [PATCH] Use range based loops to iterate over vec<> in various places

On 6/8/21 6:48 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote: Hello, This makes things a good bit shorter, and reduces complexity by removing a bunch of index variables. Very nice cleanup! Thank you! Martin bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, ok? Trev gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog: * call-str

Re: [PATCH] Use range based loops to iterate over vec<> in various places

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:32 PM Trevor Saunders wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:06:44PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:48 AM Trevor Saunders > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This makes things a good bit shorter, and reduces complexity by removing > > > a

Re: [PATCH] Use range based loops to iterate over vec<> in various places

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:06:44PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:48 AM Trevor Saunders wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > This makes things a good bit shorter, and reduces complexity by removing > > a bunch of index variables. > > > > bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux

Re: [PATCH] Use range based loops to iterate over vec<> in various places

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:48 AM Trevor Saunders wrote: > > Hello, > > This makes things a good bit shorter, and reduces complexity by removing > a bunch of index variables. > > bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, ok? I'd call the cases where you are able to remove the iterator variable

[PATCH] Use range based loops to iterate over vec<> in various places

Hello, This makes things a good bit shorter, and reduces complexity by removing a bunch of index variables. bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, ok? Trev gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog: * call-string.cc (call_string::call_string): Iterate over vec<> with range based for.