On February 7, 2015 11:55:23 AM CET, Eric Botcazou
wrote:
>> I think for using option processing langhooks it would require
>massive Ada
>> FE surgery, the thing is that right now all the option processing is
>> performed, then at some later point the TU is parsed, then depending
>on what
>> is s
> I think for using option processing langhooks it would require massive Ada
> FE surgery, the thing is that right now all the option processing is
> performed, then at some later point the TU is parsed, then depending on what
> is seen in there the options are tweaked and finally everything is han
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 11:28:54AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On February 6, 2015 9:26:29 PM CET, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >As mentioned in the PR, the problem here is that the Ada FE needs to
> >modify
> >global_options after toplevel.c (process_options), but as for LTO we
> >now use
On February 6, 2015 9:26:29 PM CET, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>As mentioned in the PR, the problem here is that the Ada FE needs to
>modify
>global_options after toplevel.c (process_options), but as for LTO we
>now use
>optimization_{default,current}_node for options of functions without
>specif
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, the problem here is that the Ada FE needs to modify
global_options after toplevel.c (process_options), but as for LTO we now use
optimization_{default,current}_node for options of functions without
specifial optimization node, it means the changed options aren't reflect
