On 9/9/19 1:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:24:53PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> You are right. What about the suggested patch?
>
> Can you please quickly (say with svn blame) double check whether the
> descriptions weren't actually right but misleading (an option could
>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:24:53PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> You are right. What about the suggested patch?
Can you please quickly (say with svn blame) double check whether the
descriptions weren't actually right but misleading (an option could
be deprecated in N and removed in N+1 or so, so se
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 12:24, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 9/9/19 1:08 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:02:32PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> >> On 9/6/19 4:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:48:53AM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 20
> and planned to be phased out, but still available for use."
You are right. What about the suggested patch?
Martin
> That is not the case here in GCC 10, the feature has been removed, it has
> been deprecated in GCC 9.N for N >= 2 only.
>
> Jakub
>
>From e
