On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 05:09:17PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Is there any chance you could look at replacing the i386 code to work with
> the new IFN style used by Aarch64?
Maybe for GCC 10, I'm afraid it is a lot of work mainly due to the weirdnesses
of
x86 mixed index vs. data sized types,
On December 12, 2018 11:43:10 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>We support either the AVX2 gather loads (128-bit or 256-bit, using
>masks in
>vector registers), both conditional and unconditional, but AVX512F
>gather
>loads only unconditional. The problem was that tree-vect-stmts.c
>did
Hi!
We support either the AVX2 gather loads (128-bit or 256-bit, using masks in
vector registers), both conditional and unconditional, but AVX512F gather
loads only unconditional. The problem was that tree-vect-stmts.c didn't
have code to deal with the integral masktype argument the builtins have
