On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:47:13PM +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> > This patch adds support for -fsanitize=leak and -static-liblsan options.
> > If combined with -fsanitize=address, it does nothing,
>
> >From this hunk:
>
> @@ -8123,7 +8133,10 @@ sanitize_spec_function (int argc, const
>
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> This patch adds support for -fsanitize=leak and -static-liblsan options.
> If combined with -fsanitize=address, it does nothing,
>From this hunk:
@@ -8123,7 +8133,10 @@ sanitize_spec_function (int argc, const
return (flag_sanitize & SANITIZE_THREAD) ? "" : N
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:40:14AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> > Jakub already wrote the invoke.texi part:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02061.html
>
> Ah, thanks, I somehow missed it. When will this end up in trunk? I
> have a depending patch.
When it is reviewed. I have vari
> Jakub already wrote the invoke.texi part:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02061.html
Ah, thanks, I somehow missed it. When will this end up in trunk? I have
a depending patch.
-Y
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:28:48AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> >>This patch adds support for -fsanitize=leak and -static-liblsan options.
> >>...
> >
> >Documentation?
> >
> >Ian
>
> In case this is a prereq for commit, here is a simple addition to invoke.texi.
Jakub already wrote the invoke.texi
This patch adds support for -fsanitize=leak and -static-liblsan options.
...
Documentation?
Ian
In case this is a prereq for commit, here is a simple addition to invoke.texi.
-Y
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 7074a48..960df85 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
++
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 01:15:02PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Moreover, it fixes the bootstrap-ubsan failure when
> building fixincl - I guess the gnu-user.h hunk was missing. Thanks.
Sorry, turned out this is bogus. It really will need some
configure/Makefile fix.
Marek
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:34:14PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds support for -fsanitize=leak and -static-liblsan options.
> > If combined with -fsanitize=address, it does nothing, otherwise it links
> > in liblsan, a
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 08:41:38PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This patch adds support for -fsanitize=leak and -static-liblsan options.
> If combined with -fsanitize=address, it does nothing, otherwise it links
> in liblsan, a new shared+static library (on x86_64-linux only so far,
> the
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> This patch adds support for -fsanitize=leak and -static-liblsan options.
> If combined with -fsanitize=address, it does nothing, otherwise it links
> in liblsan, a new shared+static library (on x86_64-linux only so far,
> the code isn't 32
Hi!
This patch adds support for -fsanitize=leak and -static-liblsan options.
If combined with -fsanitize=address, it does nothing, otherwise it links
in liblsan, a new shared+static library (on x86_64-linux only so far,
the code isn't 32-bit ready apparently).
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-lin
11 matches
Mail list logo
