On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 19:22 -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 06:41 PM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 15:35 -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> >> On 08/08/2012 03:27 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William J. Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Thanks for the review of part 2! Here's another chunk of the SLSR code
> > (I feel I owe you a few beers at this point). This performs analysis
> > and replacement on groups
On 08/08/2012 06:41 PM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 15:35 -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> On 08/08/2012 03:27 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> +/* { dg-do co
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 15:35 -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 03:27 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William J. Schmidt
> >> wrote:
> >>> Greetings,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the review of part 2! Here's anot
On 08/08/2012 03:27 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William J. Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review of part 2! Here's another chunk of the SLSR code
>>> (I feel I owe you a few beers at this p
On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> This doesn't work on x32 nor Linux/ia32 since -m32
> may not be needed for ILP32. This patch works for
> me. OK to install?
Ok.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William J. Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Thanks for the review of part 2! Here's another chunk of the SLSR code
>> (I feel I owe you a few beers at this point). This performs analysis
>> and replacement on
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:36 AM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Thanks for the review of part 2! Here's another chunk of the SLSR code
> (I feel I owe you a few beers at this point). This performs analysis
> and replacement on groups of related candidates having an SSA name
> (rather
Greetings,
Thanks for the review of part 2! Here's another chunk of the SLSR code
(I feel I owe you a few beers at this point). This performs analysis
and replacement on groups of related candidates having an SSA name
(rather than a constant) for a stride.
This leaves only the conditional incre
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 15:06 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > Here's a new version of the main strength reduction patch, addressing
> > > previous comments. A couple of quick notes:
> > >
Here's a new version of the main strength reduction patch, addressing
previous comments. A couple of quick notes:
* I opened PR53773 and PR53774 for the cases where commutative
operations were encountered with a constant in rhs1. This version of
the patch still has the gcc_asserts in place to ca
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 10:44 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> > I ran into a glitch with multiply_by_const_cost. The original code
> > declared a static htab_t in the function and allocated it on demand.
> > When I tried adding a second one in the s
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 10:44 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
>
> > As promised, this breaks out the changes to the IVOPTS cost model and
> > the added function in double-int.c. Please let me know if you would
> > rather see me attempt to consolidate
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> As promised, this breaks out the changes to the IVOPTS cost model and
> the added function in double-int.c. Please let me know if you would
> rather see me attempt to consolidate the IVOPTS logic into expmed.c per
> Richard H's suggestion.
If we s
As promised, this breaks out the changes to the IVOPTS cost model and
the added function in double-int.c. Please let me know if you would
rather see me attempt to consolidate the IVOPTS logic into expmed.c per
Richard H's suggestion.
I ran into a glitch with multiply_by_const_cost. The original
15 matches
Mail list logo
