On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 13:57 +, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 21/03/12 13:40, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > And it becomes even more difficult with more complex scenarios.
> > Consider:
> >
> > a = x + (3 * s);
> > b = x + (5 * s);
> > c = x + (7 * s);
> >
> > The framework I've developed
On 21/03/12 13:40, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 10:33 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, William J. Schmidt
>>> wrote:
Greetings,
Now that we're into stage 1 again, I'd li
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 10:33 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, William J. Schmidt
> > > wrote:
> > >> Greetings,
> > >>
> > >> Now that we're into stage 1
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 10:33 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, William J. Schmidt
> > wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> Now that we're into stage 1 again, I'd like to submit the first round of
> >> changes for
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, William J. Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Now that we're into stage 1 again, I'd like to submit the first round of
>> changes for dominator-based strength reduction, which will address
>> issues from PR
I knew I was forgetting something: bootstrapped and tested with no
additional regressions on powerpc64-linux-gnu...
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 20:38 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 18:19 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, William J. Schmidt
> > w
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 18:19 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, William J. Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Now that we're into stage 1 again, I'd like to submit the first round of
> > changes for dominator-based strength reduction, which will address
> > issues f
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Now that we're into stage 1 again, I'd like to submit the first round of
> changes for dominator-based strength reduction, which will address
> issues from PR22586, PR35308, PR46556, and perhaps others. I'm
> attaching tw
