On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:01 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/12/19 9:39 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 8:50 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/11/19 3:20 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 9:23 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> >>
On 11/12/19 9:39 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 8:50 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/11/19 3:20 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 9:23 AM Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
The small patch is about sorting of debug counter
values.
Ready to be installed?
OK
Thanks
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 8:50 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/11/19 3:20 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 9:23 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> The small patch is about sorting of debug counter
> >> values.
> >>
> >> Ready to be installed?
> >
> > OK
> >
> >> Th
On 11/11/19 3:20 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 9:23 AM Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
The small patch is about sorting of debug counter
values.
Ready to be installed?
OK
Thanks,
Martin
Hi.
There's a small follow up where I enforce the sorting via a selftest.
Ready for tr
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 9:23 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> The small patch is about sorting of debug counter
> values.
>
> Ready to be installed?
OK
> Thanks,
> Martin
Hi.
The small patch is about sorting of debug counter
values.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
>From f9e1387c8e03d73d00d701fa9754af850424215f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:03:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Sort debug counter names.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2