On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 01:34:07PM +0300, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > So, is the patch ok for trunk with the two testcases turned into
> > dg-do assemble tests, or do you want me to repost with that, or add the
> > Yv constraint right away, something else?
> Nope. Patch is pre-OK. Thanks!
Actually, i
On 05 May 11:56, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 12:49:57PM +0300, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Hi Jakub,
> > On 03 May 20:57, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > This patch improves code generation e.g. on the first attached testcase
> > > and allows accepting the second one.
> > >
> > > I've n
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 12:49:57PM +0300, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
> On 03 May 20:57, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > This patch improves code generation e.g. on the first attached testcase
> > and allows accepting the second one.
> >
> > I've noticed we don't allow TFmode or V1TImode in xmm16+ r
Hi Jakub,
On 03 May 20:57, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This patch improves code generation e.g. on the first attached testcase
> and allows accepting the second one.
>
> I've noticed we don't allow TFmode or V1TImode in xmm16+ regs at all,
> while they are allowed in xmm0-xmm15, so IMHO should
Hi!
This patch improves code generation e.g. on the first attached testcase
and allows accepting the second one.
I've noticed we don't allow TFmode or V1TImode in xmm16+ regs at all,
while they are allowed in xmm0-xmm15, so IMHO should be ok even with
AVX512VL.
Wonder if it wouldn't be better to
