On 07/03/16 12:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
OK for stage4 trunk if bootstrap and reg-test succeeds?
Ok, with a minor nits.
2016-03-07 Tom de Vries
PR tree-optimization/70116
* tree-ssa-tail-merge.c (merge_stmts_p):
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:26:10PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> OK for stage4 trunk if bootstrap and reg-test succeeds?
Ok, with a minor nits.
> 2016-03-07 Tom de Vries
>
> PR tree-optimization/70116
> * tree-ssa-tail-merge.c (merge_stmts_p): New function, factored out
> of
On 07/03/16 11:01, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:49:14AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
This patch implements that.
Should the asan internal function (ASAN_CHECK) be handled in the same way,
as suggested here ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00776.html
)?
OK for st
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:49:14AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> This patch implements that.
>
> Should the asan internal function (ASAN_CHECK) be handled in the same way,
> as suggested here ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00776.html
> )?
>
> OK for stage4 trunk if bootstrap and r
[ was: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Fix ubsan tests by disabling of an optimization. ]
On 10/07/15 22:11, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/10/2015 02:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
But the warning on the "bogus" line will still be warranted, so user
goes and
fixes it.
But when the user gets the "bogus" line, he may lo
