On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> I prepared another patch that includes test-case as you requested.
>
> Below are answers on your questions.
>
>> First, for the benefit of anyone trying to understand what you're doing,
>> defining what "cd equivalent" means woul
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> I prepared another patch that includes test-case as you requested.
>
> Below are answers on your questions.
>
>> First, for the benefit of anyone trying to understand what you're doing,
>> defining what "cd equivalent" means woul
Jeff,
I prepared another patch that includes test-case as you requested.
Below are answers on your questions.
> First, for the benefit of anyone trying to understand what you're doing,
> defining what "cd equivalent" means would be >helpful.
I added the following comment to function:
fwe
On 10/16/14 05:52, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
Hi All,
Here is a simple enhancement for predicate computation in if-convert phase:
We use notion of cd equivalence to get simpler predicate for
join block, e.g. if join block has 2 predecessors with predicates
p1 & p2 and p1 & !p2, we'd l
Hi All,
Here is a simple enhancement for predicate computation in if-convert phase:
We use notion of cd equivalence to get simpler predicate for
join block, e.g. if join block has 2 predecessors with predicates
p1 & p2 and p1 & !p2, we'd like to get p1 for it instead of
p1 & p2 |
