Re: [PATCH] Shrink back size of tree_exp from 40 bytes to 32

On 12/14/24 5:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! The following patch implements what I've mentioned in the 64-bit location_t thread. struct tree_exp had unsigned condition_uid member added for something rarely used (-fcondition-coverage) and even there used only on very small subset of trees onl

[PATCH] Shrink back size of tree_exp from 40 bytes to 32

Hi! The following patch implements what I've mentioned in the 64-bit location_t thread. struct tree_exp had unsigned condition_uid member added for something rarely used (-fcondition-coverage) and even there used only on very small subset of trees only for the duration of the gimplification. The