On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:18:32AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 22:14 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:57:49PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:53:50PM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > > > > > As far as I can
> > > > >
On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 22:14 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:57:49PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:53:50PM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > > > > As far as I can
> > > > > tell this just involves moving the start of namespace
> > > > > selfte
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:57:49PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:53:50PM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > > > As far as I can
> > > > tell this just involves moving the start of namespace selftest
> > > > upwards a
> > > > bit in the files where we have tests.
> > >
>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:53:50PM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > > As far as I can
> > > tell this just involves moving the start of namespace selftest
> > > upwards a
> > > bit in the files where we have tests.
> >
> > Yes, and it does seem cleaner to have all of the selftest code start
> >
> > As far as I can
> > tell this just involves moving the start of namespace selftest
> > upwards a
> > bit in the files where we have tests.
>
> Yes, and it does seem cleaner to have all of the selftest code start
> like this:
>
> #if CHECKING_P
What are we gaining by ifdefing this? I woul
On 06/06/2016 04:17 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
I'm testing a revised patch now, incorporating the above, and renaming
s-selftests (plural) to s-selftest (singular) etc within
gcc/Makefile.in as requested by Bernhard elsewhere in this thread. I
assume that change is OK?
Sure.
Bernd
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 13:37 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 06/03/2016 09:12 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > It's not clear to me if these approvals still hold.
>
> I was willing to go with it; I had a look through some of these
> patches
> and didn't spot anything untoward. To make it clear, this
On 06/03/2016 09:12 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
It's not clear to me if these approvals still hold.
I was willing to go with it; I had a look through some of these patches
and didn't spot anything untoward. To make it clear, this patch is OK,
with one tweak if possible: extend the namespace self
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 01:21 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 11:06 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > * Makefile.in (OBJS): Add function-tests.o,
> > hash-map-tests.o, hash-set-tests.o, rtl-tests.o,
> > selftest-run-tests.o.
> > (OBJS-libcommon): Add selftest
