Re: [PING] [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-11-06 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 10/30/20 4:08 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:34:53AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 10/28/20 11:29 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 08:39:41AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/28/20 3:38 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via G

Re: [PING] [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-11-06 Thread Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches
On 06.11.20 04:52, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On 10/30/20 7:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> It's not that more / different inlining inherently exposes _more_ >> false positives in the middle-end warnings. They simply expose >> others and the GCC codebase is cleansed (by those who chan

Re: [PING] [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-11-05 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 10/30/20 7:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > It's not that more / different inlining inherently exposes _more_ > false positives in the middle-end warnings. They simply expose > others and the GCC codebase is cleansed (by those who change > inliner heuristics / tunings) from those by either fi

Re: [PING] [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-10-30 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:09 AM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:34:53AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 10/28/20 11:29 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 08:39:41AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > >> On 10/28/20 3:38

Re: [PING] [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-10-30 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:34:53AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 10/28/20 11:29 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 08:39:41AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > >> On 10/28/20 3:38 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches wrote: > >>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 02:02:57PM

Re: [PING] [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-10-29 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
Jeff Law via Gcc-patches writes: > On 10/28/20 11:29 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 08:39:41AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 10/28/20 3:38 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches wrote: On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 02:02:57PM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielin

Re: [PING] [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-10-28 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 10/28/20 11:29 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 08:39:41AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 10/28/20 3:38 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 02:02:57PM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via >>> Gcc-patches wrote: >>>

Re: [PING] [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-10-28 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 08:39:41AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 10/28/20 3:38 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 02:02:57PM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via > > Gcc-patches wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:59:30PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel

Re: [PING] [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-10-28 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 10/28/20 3:38 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 02:02:57PM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via > Gcc-patches wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:59:30PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >>> On 15.09.20 17:02, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: >

Re: [PING] [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-10-28 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 02:02:57PM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:59:30PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > > On 15.09.20 17:02, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > > Over the last couple of months quite a few warnings about uninitialized >

Re: [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-10-05 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:59:30PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > On 15.09.20 17:02, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > Over the last couple of months quite a few warnings about uninitialized > > variables were raised while building GCC. A reason why these warnings > > show up on S/390 only i

Re: [PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-09-22 Thread Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches
On 15.09.20 17:02, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > Over the last couple of months quite a few warnings about uninitialized > variables were raised while building GCC. A reason why these warnings > show up on S/390 only is due to the aggressive inlining settings here. > Some of these warnings

[PATCH] S/390: Do not turn maybe-uninitialized warnings into errors

2020-09-15 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches
Over the last couple of months quite a few warnings about uninitialized variables were raised while building GCC. A reason why these warnings show up on S/390 only is due to the aggressive inlining settings here. Some of these warnings (2c832ffedf0, b776bdca932, 2786c0221b6, 1657178f59b) could be