Hi,
On Tue, May 18 2021, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
[...]
> From 7fcc6ca9ef3b6acbfbcbd3da4be1d1c0eef4be80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xiong Hu Luo
> Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 20:46:15 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] Run pass_sink_code once more before store_merging
>
> Gimple sink code pas
On 5/18/21 12:34 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2021/5/18 15:02, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> Can you, for the new gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c testcase, add
>>> a comment explaining what operations we expect to sink? The testcase
>>> is likely
On Tue, 18 May 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021/5/18 15:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Can you, for the new gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c testcase, add
> > a comment explaining what operations we expect to sink? The testcase
> > is likely somewhat fragile in the exact number of sinkings
Hi,
On 2021/5/18 15:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> Can you, for the new gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c testcase, add
> a comment explaining what operations we expect to sink? The testcase
> is likely somewhat fragile in the exact number of sinkings
> (can you check on some other target and maybe P8BE
On Tue, 18 May 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021/5/17 16:11, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 May 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Richi,
> >>
> >> On 2021/4/21 19:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
> >>>
>
>
> On 2021/4/15 19:
Hi,
On 2021/5/17 16:11, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
Hi Richi,
On 2021/4/21 19:54, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
On 2021/4/15 19:34, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
Thanks,
On 2021/4/14 14:
