On Tue, 7 May 2013, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> The intent of conditional candidate processing in SLSR was always to
> apply it only to CAND_MULT candidates [(base + index) * stride].
> However, I neglected to actually enforce this, leading to wrong code
> generated for CAND_ADD candidates. This patch
The intent of conditional candidate processing in SLSR was always to
apply it only to CAND_MULT candidates [(base + index) * stride].
However, I neglected to actually enforce this, leading to wrong code
generated for CAND_ADD candidates. This patch adds the restriction.
My previous "fix" wasn't s
