On Wed, 2021-10-20 09:43:42 +0200, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> The removal of --param=max-fsm-thread-length is causing code
> explosion. I thought that --param=max-fsm-thread-path-insns was a
> better gague for path profitability than raw BB length, but it turns
> out that we don't t
The removal of --param=max-fsm-thread-length is causing code
explosion. I thought that --param=max-fsm-thread-path-insns was a
better gague for path profitability than raw BB length, but it turns
out that we don't take into account PHIs when estimating the number of
statements.
In this PR, we hav
