On 22/05/2023 22:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 21:51, François Dumont via Libstdc++
mailto:libstdc%2b...@gcc.gnu.org>> wrote:
I was thinking that it might be nice to get rid of
predefined_ops.h content.
So here is a start with __negate. Drawback is that stl
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 21:51, François Dumont via Libstdc++ <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> I was thinking that it might be nice to get rid of predefined_ops.h
> content.
>
> So here is a start with __negate. Drawback is that stl_algo.h has to
> include .
We definitely don't want that. std::no
I was thinking that it might be nice to get rid of predefined_ops.h content.
So here is a start with __negate. Drawback is that stl_algo.h has to
include . For now I just get rid of stl_algo.h include in
to rather use stl_algobase.h. But maybe it would be better
to also isolate std::not_fn in
