> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen
> >
> > Some external tools special case __gnu_lto* symbols, and the new
> > __gnu_slim_lto
> > was the only LTO symbol not matching this pattern. Since I don't think
> > there are any users rename it to __gnu_lto_slim
> >
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> Some external tools special case __gnu_lto* symbols, and the new
> __gnu_slim_lto
> was the only LTO symbol not matching this pattern. Since I don't think
> there are any users rename it to __gnu_lto_slim
>
> Passes bootst
From: Andi Kleen
Some external tools special case __gnu_lto* symbols, and the new __gnu_slim_lto
was the only LTO symbol not matching this pattern. Since I don't think
there are any users rename it to __gnu_lto_slim
Passes bootstrap and test suite on x86_64-linux. Ok?
Cc: hubi...@ucw.cz
gcc/: