This patch is OK.
Sorry for not looking at it earlier.
Thanks.
Ian
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> ping 2
>
> Am 15.05.2013 13:46, schrieb Matthias Klose:
>> ping?
>>
>> regenerated the patch for the trunk, check with builds on arm-linux-gnueabihf
>> and x86_64-linux-g
ping 2
Am 15.05.2013 13:46, schrieb Matthias Klose:
> ping?
>
> regenerated the patch for the trunk, check with builds on arm-linux-gnueabihf
> and x86_64-linux-gnu
>
> Matthias
>
> * libgcc2.c: Don't include .
>
> Am 14.01.2013 22:54, schrieb Matthias Klose:
>> Am 04.01.2013 20:01, sc
ping?
regenerated the patch for the trunk, check with builds on arm-linux-gnueabihf
and x86_64-linux-gnu
Matthias
* libgcc2.c: Don't include .
Am 14.01.2013 22:54, schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Am 04.01.2013 20:01, schrieb Wookey:
>> I filed http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=557
Am 04.01.2013 20:01, schrieb Wookey:
> I filed http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55743 (my first
> upstream gcc bug so be gentle :-)
>
> Details are there but the short version is that the limits.h inclusion
> in libgcc2.c is now a relic because the constants that it brings
> in are no l
I filed http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55743 (my first
upstream gcc bug so be gentle :-)
Details are there but the short version is that the limits.h inclusion
in libgcc2.c is now a relic because the constants that it brings
in are no longer used (since
http://repo.or.cz/w/official-gc
