在 2022-05-10 22:28, Jakub Jelinek 写道:
This looks reasonable, but doesn't contain the most important part.
As mentioned in https://gcc.gnu.org/r12-5855
the generic part can now support relocation of PCH, so it is fine if it is
mapped at some other address, it is preferrable if it is mapped at the
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:30:03PM +0800, LIU Hao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> From 2e314baed84fd80b3b3c4c67787a032b86dd54dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: LIU Hao
> Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:19:07 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] [PR14940] Remove size limit of PCH
>
> There shouldn't be such a limit in pr
On 5/10/22 13:30, LIU Hao wrote:
在 2022-05-10 20:00, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
On Tue, 2022-05-10 at 19:35 +0800, LIU Hao via Gcc-patches wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] Remove size limit of PCH
Make it "Remove size limit of PCH [PR14940]", so once it's committed a
message will show up in bugzi
在 2022-05-10 20:00, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
On Tue, 2022-05-10 at 19:35 +0800, LIU Hao via Gcc-patches wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] Remove size limit of PCH
Make it "Remove size limit of PCH [PR14940]", so once it's committed a
message will show up in bugzilla.
Here is the revised patc
On Tue, 2022-05-10 at 19:35 +0800, LIU Hao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] Remove size limit of PCH
Make it "Remove size limit of PCH [PR14940]", so once it's committed a
message will show up in bugzilla.
> Reference: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
7; program, and seen no problems so far.
After eighteen years this has eventually been settled. (sigh)
--
Best regards,
LIU Hao
From c084ab275f47cc27621e664d1c63e177525cf321 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: LIU Hao
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:19:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Remove size limit of PCH
