On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 3:19 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:07 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 3:59 AM liuhongt wrote:
> > >
> > > The target hook is only used by i386, and the current definition is
> > > same as default gen_reg_rtx. So there's no ne
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 11:18:33AM +0100, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Is/was the code ever exercised for non-x86? HJ, what was the reason to
> abstract this?
Initially the hook looked like
rtx
ix86_gen_scratch_sse_rtx (machine_mode mode)
{
if (TARGET_SSE)
return gen_rtx_REG (mod
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:07 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 3:59 AM liuhongt wrote:
> >
> > The target hook is only used by i386, and the current definition is
> > same as default gen_reg_rtx. So there's no need for this target hook.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 3:59 AM liuhongt wrote:
>
> The target hook is only used by i386, and the current definition is
> same as default gen_reg_rtx. So there's no need for this target hook.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}.
> Ok for trunk(or GCC14)?
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
The target hook is only used by i386, and the current definition is
same as default gen_reg_rtx. So there's no need for this target hook.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}.
Ok for trunk(or GCC14)?
gcc/ChangeLog:
* builtins.cc (builtin_memset_read_str): Replace
