Re: [PATCH] Relax one gcc_assert in lra-eliminate for fixed register

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/17/14 02:26, Jiong Wang wrote: >> >> as Pinski reported at >> >>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01967.html >> >> the previosu LR free patch on AArch64 cause one gcc_assert in >> lra-elimination.c >> >> one of the problem i

Re: [PATCH] Relax one gcc_assert in lra-eliminate for fixed register

2014-11-17 20:36 GMT+00:00 Jeff Law : > On 11/17/14 02:26, Jiong Wang wrote: >> >> as Pinski reported at >> >>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01967.html >> >> the previosu LR free patch on AArch64 cause one gcc_assert in >> lra-elimination.c >> >> one of the problem is that gcc_as

Re: [PATCH] Relax one gcc_assert in lra-eliminate for fixed register

On 11/17/14 02:26, Jiong Wang wrote: as Pinski reported at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01967.html the previosu LR free patch on AArch64 cause one gcc_assert in lra-elimination.c one of the problem is that gcc_assert is too strict and overkilled some valid cases. the purpo

[PATCH] Relax one gcc_assert in lra-eliminate for fixed register

as Pinski reported at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01967.html the previosu LR free patch on AArch64 cause one gcc_assert in lra-elimination.c one of the problem is that gcc_assert is too strict and overkilled some valid cases. the purpose of that assert is described here