On 03/02/16 12:13 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 20:36 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I had some difficulty reading the new section; mostly due to the
leapfrogging of C++11 by the default (my immediate reaction was "why is
it talking about C++11 when the option says GNU++14?")
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 20:36 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I had some difficulty reading the new section; mostly due to the
leapfrogging of C++11 by the default (my immediate reaction was "why is
it talking about C++11 when the option says GNU++14?")
I'm attaching a patch which I hope clarifies it
