Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Remove xfail from ssa-fre-3.c testcase

2023-12-06 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Wed, 06 Dec 2023 10:48:30 PST (-0800), Vineet Gupta wrote: On 12/6/23 08:22, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: Ran the test case at 122e7b4f9d0c2d54d865272463a1d812002d0a5c where the xfail That's the original port submission, I'm actually kind of surprised it still builds/works at all. Full toolchain

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Remove xfail from ssa-fre-3.c testcase

2023-12-06 Thread Vineet Gupta
On 12/6/23 08:22, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> Ran the test case at 122e7b4f9d0c2d54d865272463a1d812002d0a5c where the xfail > That's the original port submission, I'm actually kind of surprised it > still builds/works at all. Full toolchain build would have been a stretch (matching pairing binutil

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Remove xfail from ssa-fre-3.c testcase

2023-12-06 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 16:39:06 PST (-0800), e...@rivosinc.com wrote: Ran the test case at 122e7b4f9d0c2d54d865272463a1d812002d0a5c where the xfail That's the original port submission, I'm actually kind of surprised it still builds/works at all. was introduced. The test did pass at that hash a

[PATCH] RISC-V: Remove xfail from ssa-fre-3.c testcase

2023-12-05 Thread Edwin Lu
Ran the test case at 122e7b4f9d0c2d54d865272463a1d812002d0a5c where the xfail was introduced. The test did pass at that hash and has continued to pass since then. Remove the xfail gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-3.c: Remove xfail Signed-off-by: Edwin Lu --- gcc/test