Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Remove the priority in FMV ASM name mangling

On 3/25/25 8:04 AM, Yangyu Chen wrote: On 25/3/2025 21:23, Kito Cheng wrote: Will it only cause issues with this patch https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/678918.html Yes. But I think we can merge this first. But if this patch doesn't fix a regression or possibly a correc

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Remove the priority in FMV ASM name mangling

On 25/3/2025 21:23, Kito Cheng wrote: Will it only cause issues with this patch https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/678918.html Yes. But I think we can merge this first. Thanks, Yangyu Chen or will it cause problems with the current trunk as well? If the latter one, coul

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Remove the priority in FMV ASM name mangling

Will it only cause issues with this patch https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/678918.html or will it cause problems with the current trunk as well? If the latter one, could you provide a case for that? Thanks :) On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 7:15 PM Yangyu Chen wrote: > > We don't ne

[PATCH] RISC-V: Remove the priority in FMV ASM name mangling

We don't need to add priority in ASM name mangling, keeping this might cause an issue if we call another MV clone directly but only one place has the priority declared. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_mangle_decl_assembler_name): Remove priority in fmv asm name mangl