RE: [PATCH] RISC-V: Remove redundant vlmul_ext_* patterns to fix PR110109

2023-06-04 Thread Li, Pan2 via Gcc-patches
: Remove redundant vlmul_ext_* patterns to fix PR110109 On 6/4/23 02:51, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote: > From: Juzhe-Zhong > > PR target/110109 > > This patch is to fix PR110109 issue. This issue happens is because: > > (define_insn_and_split "*vlmul_extx2&quo

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Remove redundant vlmul_ext_* patterns to fix PR110109

2023-06-04 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 6/4/23 02:51, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote: From: Juzhe-Zhong PR target/110109 This patch is to fix PR110109 issue. This issue happens is because: (define_insn_and_split "*vlmul_extx2" [(set (match_operand: 0 "register_operand" "=vr, ?&vr") (subreg: (match_o

[PATCH] RISC-V: Remove redundant vlmul_ext_* patterns to fix PR110109

2023-06-04 Thread juzhe . zhong
From: Juzhe-Zhong PR target/110109 This patch is to fix PR110109 issue. This issue happens is because: (define_insn_and_split "*vlmul_extx2" [(set (match_operand: 0 "register_operand" "=vr, ?&vr") (subreg: (match_operand:VLMULEXT2 1 "register_operand" " 0, vr") 0))]