The current implementation of this function is somewhat difficult to
understand, as it uses a direct break statement within the for loop,
rendering the loop meaningless. Additionally, during the Coverity check
on the for loop, a warning appeared: "unreachable: Since the loop
increment ix++; is unre
Hi Ma Jin,
thanks for looking into this, it has been on my todo list with very low
priority since the vsetvl rewrite.
+ /* Handle case with no predecessors (including ENTRY block). */
+ if (EDGE_COUNT (b->preds) == 0)
{
- e = EDGE_PRED (b, ix);
- bitmap_copy (dst, src[e->src
