> It's worth noting there is a newer way which is usually slightly simpler
> than a match_operator. Specifically code iterators.
Thank you for the very detailed feedback. It is not a problem to add code
iterators. I would add iterators for "eq" and "ne" in riscv/iterators.md since
they don't cur
On 9/2/24 7:52 AM, Jovan Vukic wrote:
The patch adds a new instruction pattern to handle conditional branches
with equality checks between shifted arithmetic operands. This pattern
optimizes the use of shifted constants (with trailing zeros), making it
more efficient.
For the C code:
void
The patch adds a new instruction pattern to handle conditional branches with
equality checks between shifted arithmetic operands. This pattern optimizes the
use of shifted constants (with trailing zeros), making it more efficient.
For the C code:
void f5(long long a) {
if ((a & 0x212) == 0
