Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Imply C from Zca whenever possible [PR119122]

On 3/5/25 5:05 AM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote: GCC must imply C extension from Zca extension when it's possible. It's necessary for achieving compatibility between different march strings which in fact may be the same. E.g., if rv32ic multilib configuration is presented in GCC, then GCC will not cho

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Imply C from Zca whenever possible [PR119122]

On 3/5/25 5:05 AM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote: GCC must imply C extension from Zca extension when it's possible. It's necessary for achieving compatibility between different march strings which in fact may be the same. E.g., if rv32ic multilib configuration is presented in GCC, then GCC will not cho

[PATCH] RISC-V: Imply C from Zca whenever possible [PR119122]

GCC must imply C extension from Zca extension when it's possible. It's necessary for achieving compatibility between different march strings which in fact may be the same. E.g., if rv32ic multilib configuration is presented in GCC, then GCC will not choose this configuration for linking if -march=