Hi Robin,
On 2023/11/7 15:57, Robin Dapp wrote:
Thanks, what I was slightly concerned about is that we now have
the implicit assumption that the initial value is 0. I mean
that's what the vectorizer does for reductions but theoretically,
wouldn't we also combine other values into 0 now?
Sorry
Thanks, what I was slightly concerned about is that we now have
the implicit assumption that the initial value is 0. I mean
that's what the vectorizer does for reductions but theoretically,
wouldn't we also combine other values into 0 now?
Regards
Robin
il.com>; lehua.ding
<mailto:lehua.d...@rivai.ai>
*Subject:* [PATCH] RISC-V: Fixed failed rvv combine testcases
Hi,
This patch fixed the fellowing failed testcases on the trunk:
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_widen_reduc-2.c
scan-assembler-times
\\tvf
LGTM. Thanks for fixing it.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Lehua Ding
Date: 2023-11-07 15:49
To: gcc-patches
CC: juzhe.zhong; kito.cheng; rdapp.gcc; palmer; jeffreyalaw; lehua.ding
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fixed failed rvv combine testcases
Hi,
This patch fixed the fellowing failed testcases on
Hi,
This patch fixed the fellowing failed testcases on the trunk:
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_widen_reduc-2.c
scan-assembler-times \\tvfwredusum\\.vs\\tv[0-9]+,v[0-9]+,v[0-9]+,v0\\.t 2
...
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/cond/cond_widen_reduc-2.c
scan-assembler-times \\tvwred
