Committed, thanks!
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 5:32 PM Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 06:00, Lin Sinan wrote:
> >
> > From: Lin Sinan
> >
> > The partial subreg check should be for subreg operand(operand 1) instead of
> > the immediate operand(operand 2). This change also fix pr
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 06:00, Lin Sinan wrote:
>
> From: Lin Sinan
>
> The partial subreg check should be for subreg operand(operand 1) instead of
> the immediate operand(operand 2). This change also fix pr68648.c in zbs.
Good catch.
Reviewed-by:
I encountered a miscompilation case with zbs, where bseti without sign
extension emitted from bsetidisi pattern leads to wrong output.
Take pr68648.c as an example, -march=rv64gc_zba_zbb_zbs -O3 did not generate
sext.w in int bar (void) and led to a wrong value in a0. It seems that the
partial sub
From: Lin Sinan
The partial subreg check should be for subreg operand(operand 1) instead of
the immediate operand(operand 2). This change also fix pr68648.c in zbs.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/bitmanip.md: Fix wrong index in the check.
---
gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md | 2 +-
1 file
